I normally don’t like the New York Times. They seem to have a seriously biased slant to their reporting, and I prefer a more balanced view of things. However, in this case, one of their reporters has things dead on.
Susan Saulny, a writer for the New York Times, has written a story about a new problem with Foreclosure: The bank may not want your property back!
In some cases, the cost of the foreclosure exceeds the value of the property. In that case, the lender may not go through with the foreclosure, which means the holder of the title (the current homeowner) is liable for the property.
The real problem, though, is that in some cases the former owner moves out, but when the foreclosure stops, the former owner is liable for the property. In the article, Ms. Saulny goes on to explain that this liability may include fines if the home is not kept up, as well as other fees.
The rest of this story is available here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/us/30walkaway.html
Posted In: Bankruptcy, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Charge-off, Chargeoff, foreclosure, loan, Mortgage, Payment, Short Sale
That’s it. The Top 10 Ways to Protect Your Credit During Divorce.
Your life is already tough. Going through a divorce is one of the hardest things you will ever do. It touches every part of your life, and you need to protect yourself while going through it.
Remember, it is you taking care of yourself now. You HAVE to stop thinking about things as a member of a couple, and start thinking about things as a single person again.
I have posted a video series to the MyCredEd YouTube channel discussing how you can protect your credit during divorce. Remember, your divorce will be over soon, but the effects of a credit problem can last years longer!
You can view the Conclusion video here:
Remember to ask your questions about credit and debt in the form to the right. I will answer via blog or video as soon as I can!
When you fill out the form, your question goes straight to my email inbox. I am an email addict, so I will see it quickly. If I put your question into a video, or answer it in a blog, I will send you and email back to let you know the answer is ready.
I found an interesting article today on MSNBC about a $38.00 cup of coffee.
Banks are increasingly covering overdrafts, and charging a large fee for the ‘privilege’ of not having a bounce on your account.
Now, personally, I would rather not be able to pay for something than have to eat a $34.00 fee from my bank. But the banks don’t always give you that option.
Take a look at the article and let me know what you think.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29879567/